I know, I know, I'm done discussion on the evolutionary debate, but I recently had a rather one-sided argument with my father on it.
I asked him what benefit he gains from disagreeing with scientists due to his religious bias.
Pretty blunt wording I might say, but, it was an important question.
What benefit do you gain by disagreeing?
A great benefit -- if its by someone who is trying to learn new things, or unravel a set of evidence to try and understand it for yourself, perhaps even to the point of breaking new scientific ground.
Yet, this is not the naysayer's mindset. No, instead, it is purely a bias based on no material grounds. I don't expect everyone to believe in natural materialism, but it does beg question your education in this day and age.
A while ago I realized a very subtle point about the evolution "debate".
From the get go, the only reason there is a debate or even a doubting opinion about the foundation of evolution is because of religious bias. If a
book had said anything else against other scientific theories, say oh, that the Earth is flat, or that the Sun orbits around the Earth, there would surely be
other debates. But since "we've" been able to orbit around the Earth in space, I think that pretty much broke down any debates on that front. The kicker with the evolutionary debate is mainly an education problem. Evangelical children, for instance, are usually homeschooled or taught to have a strong bias against learning about the evolutionary theory in public schools. It's sad, and wrong, as it was when I was taught that Universities, Colleges, Evolution, and Scientists were all bad places, ideas, and people. I'm not really sure how I felt about that personally, I can remember a few times just smirking at such judgment even as a kid. Never actually understanding what was wrong with the theory. Even theistic evolution is better than what I had. Most things in general -- are processes that requires no bootstrapping, and we are finding that out as new observations are made around us, whether it be stellar, galactic, solar, planetary, civil, economic, and so on, things change, and things go about their daily computations based on their internals and surroundings. Nothing actually needs that extra nudge by a God, it happens because it happens.
As of yet, the creationist front has not created a proper scientific position of doubt against evolutionary theory, all that comes to hand are simple "Goddits" and "Nu uh!"'s.
Like the rest of reasoning humans (I know, that sounds awfully humble!), I can happily say the evidence is speaking for itself in these matters; if it didn't, I say off to better things. Science grows through doubt and incorrect hypothesis, not "dogmatic institutionalized truths". Sure, scientists are biased towards the evolutionary theory, but that's because it is what the evidences is leading them to believe.
What our creationists fellows in general believe is exactly what they say cannot happen.
"I've never seen something come from nothing." -- Yet, they wish to believe God zap things into reality with supernatural magic. Hmmm!